| Basically what you wish to debate is what would consitute something as being a fact.
And no doubt what the source of a fact mgiht be plays a role.
You stated an opinion as a fact but did not provide any estabished authority for that opinion that I am wrong or that my facts conflict with some better documented theory that sounds more logical.
What makes your peronsal opinion the last word (end of story)?
But it might be true in your case, your story has ended because you never could get past chapter one with your emotional attack. So I will await in-put for anyone else interested.
What do you mean by "randomly inserting things in history"? I do not think we have any history books about those fomulative years of religion where the writer did not make assumptions.
I personally have complete confidence in my resources, but the topic is not trying to make you believe in that source. So you are addressing the wrong topic at hand. What you must address for a sensible debate is the logic of what I reported, does what I said about why males dominate religion sound logical and higly possible, or not?
Technosoul. |