</span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />
Originally Posted by (castille,)
So now the Communists want to create a revolution by destroying the world first?
Now we know the REAL agenda of those student protestors....they want to turn the great cities of the world - New York, Shanghai, Paris, Berlin, London - into terrifying World War 2 warzones.
They want to force a revolution by turning the world into a chaotic warzone first.
Except for 1 problem. If that happens - if the leftists win and the industrial world turns into a pot of war and fear and destruction - it'll take another 200 years to repair.
<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'>
They have to destroy the old world in order to usher in the new. Whether through politics, revolution, or war. Any means neccessary.
</span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />
Originally Posted by (dalin,) </span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />Originally Posted by (Capitalist Pig,)
Ethnically and racially, this means an America that is no longer a First World country. Third World people of color will be the majority in two decades. Americans whose forefathers came from Europe, 90 percent of the population in 1960, will be a shrinking minority by 2040. For not only are the birth rates of white Americans lower than those of immigrants, the new immigrants will be from the Third World.
<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'>
Just wanted to touch on this before reading the rest of the thread. Um, I thought the "World" of a country was decided along economic, not ethnic, lines?<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'>
"Third World" in the article is Pat Buchannan's shorthand for undermining lesser countries and cultures. His rhetoric has fallen out of popular Conservative circles because immigration has been good to businesses and the economy in general.