| 1. There is no basis for me to assume that what you consider to be intelligence is the same as the IQ scores. Most critically, what you are experiencing as 'intelligence' may well be the same multi-dimensional construct I have been referring to all along (if I am forced to adopt a measure of intelligence, I would take a multi-dimensional view).
2. If the evidence you've provided is, in fact, correct, there is still no sense of causality -- the best you have is correlation. Given that we know that IQ measures are socio-economically biased, it is just as likely that they are either merely correlated (ie co-incidental), epiphenomenal (both caused by a third, unmentioned/unmeasured, factor) or that the causality goes in the opposite direction (having a poor education causes you to score lower on an IQ test).
3. You have stated elsewhere that measurement is essential for you to know something (a core tennant of your stated philosophy). Since you have provided no measures, I can only conclude that you have no knowledge of this.
4. The statement I wanted you to provide evidence for was the statement that "Intelligence does affect racism" (which I was using as an example of prejudice). I still see no evidence of that, and certainly no 'measured' evidence, for that assertion. |