I went to the links, and it seems like a collection of philisophical ideas all collected on one page.
Quite interesting to say the least.
</span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />
Originally Posted by strange mathematicians
Now more precisely, atoms of Helium are formed and radiation speeds away from the helium. The helium we call gain, the radiation spreads and is a loss, but For some mathematicians this is is not the reality. I know that maybe all energy stays the same, but the helium is no longer connected with the radiation. And that's the point. So that group of mathematicians may deny as hard as steel that the H-bomb explosion is possible. They also deny the so clearly viewable layers in nature.
Deny the H-bomb exposion? Yes some do that. They add, call it superposition, and they hope that they have an average solution, but with alas not counting the loss. Where is that average? Isn't this peculiar? Yes, intelligent people, how is that possible?
They think that you can look only at the past. While we know we have choices, nearly always, unexpected choices. Denying the H-Bomb explosion? Perhaps we can ask those people to explain that to us.
Said in a difficult way. These mathematicians start directly with a deterministic tool. Math is deterministic. We have made it so, and we cannot escape it any longer. But we see reality in another way. Mathematics is such a tautology. You can put something in it - determinism, and then you conclude determinism. That is really a tautology.<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'>
For some reason this paragraph reminded me of Impenitent......