Quote:
|
Quote by: Technosoul, So Bush had his speech reworded so he would say "English intelligence has said they believed they had found documented evidence that Saddam.... " etc. That trickly wording was not a lie, they did believe such, but he did not go on to say that the document was a fake according to our people, leaving the impression that it was the document was real evidence for his objective. With that wording he also put any blame for it on English Intelligence. So when Bush pretended not to be aware that the document was faked or "highly questionable" |
...he perjured the sanctity of the State of the Union, the sanctity of our fighting forces, the bond of trust a nation has for its elected president to be truthful, especially about war and national security.
Also, private news investigators (governmental watchdog groups) had uncovered evidence that Haliburtan had spent money months in advance of even 9-11 to prepare for a war with Iraq. ... and those plans were were provided Bush during his working vacation so he would know "they were were ready to go" whem ever he said the word. Some of the plans were acted upon following desert storm as a long-range plan of Halliburtan.[/quote]
war profiteers. i theorize that weapons and war industries and R&D firm for the pentagon, built up for 60 years, were disappointed and let down after the end of the cold war. that should have been the end of the wars of the 20th century. bush seemed to have lame excuses to go to war. i wonder if his real motivations were concealed.