The Purpose of Life/Existence
http://www.archaeologyinfo.com/image...eny%20copy.jpg http://i42.tinypic.com/f9lr8.jpg
In the images above, I try to explain what I mean in this section.
The first image is of evolution of Human Beings according to Charles Darwin on his Theory of Evolution. For the purposes of this theory of energy, I am going to assume that Evolution happened in the way it is presented in the image I posted.
The second image is what I believe to be going on in the Universe with all that energy we are speaking of.
The top line in the image is The Universal Consciousness and Energy and is a fixed constant. It is always moving forward and never stopping. This is the "motor" of existence, according to my theory. It does not move forward or backward at this point. [[[Does it have the ability to move time and is time even a factor? Can time be warped or is it fixed to move forward with the exception of memory and thought. How can it be fixed and move only forward if we can access the past through memory - a component of energy according to the theory]]]
The bottom line is the manifestations of the energy relating to humans. It shows that humans come closer with every evolutionary development including intelligence, knowledge, experience, physical appearance, technology, science...etc.
At point G in the image, this is where we have fully evolved to where we need no longer manifest as physical human beings. It is at this point, that I believe we start all over, only instead of starting as primordial energy with only instinct and consciousness, we start as energies that have intellect and consciousness from the start. What will we be gaining after we start all over...after we've achieved this one-ness with the Universal Consciousness again? *sigh...* once again.. I dont know but I intend to press my mind to find out.
Some thoughts have crossed my mind. In another thread someone stated that thinking of stuff like this should scare the "****" out of me. To an extent, it actually excites me because my mind fills with images of people that can move things from birth with their minds...being able to read each other's thoughts...being able to be "limitless" with their thinking...etc. Some questions that pop into mind are: would we need emotion? Would we need "time"? Would we need each other to evolve?
As far as emotion goes, I would assume that since we take everything from these lifetimes with us after we reconnect as one with the Universal Consciousness..as every experience would be implanted in the energy that would carry through into that next stage...that emotion along with everything else would be carried over as well. I do not think that we would have a problem with human ego/self awareness because we would all be interconnected to that Universal Consciousness and able to access memories of anyone else at any given time at that point. Still, then again, what good would emotion be other for entertainment purposes at that point? Would we all be "enlightened" and thinking positive thoughts and positive emotions at that point or would it be even more dangerous with people thinking "sociopathically" wanting to destroy the new way of life/world..etc. Some thoughts to ponder on.
"From day to day, ordinary life is filled with beginnings and endings. As each moment passes, a new one appears to take its place. Waking up in the morning, we rise and go about our ordinary activities of washing, getting dressed, eating breakfst and so on. Nothing in life stands still. Movement and change are the very essence of life and yet our normal tendency is to believe that everything is fixed and solid. We wish to belive all that we see is real and secure, even though our ordinary experience tells us that nothing remains unchanged and nothing lasts forever. On the contrary, everything in the world around us in constantly falling apart and rquires a great deal of maintenance on our part if we wish to hold it together."
Einstein also stated this in a converstation with Rabindranath Tagore in Germany in 1930. Their conversation, soon published in the New York Times, shines a bright light on Einstein's position and throws it into sharp relief.
E: There are two different conceptions about the nature of the universe - the world as a unity dependent on humanity, and the world as reality independent of the human factor.
T: This world is a human world - the scientific view of it is also that of the scientific man. Therefore the world apart from us does not exist; it is a relative world, depending for its reality upon our consciousness.
E: Truth, then, or beauty, is not independent of man?
T: No.
E: IF there were no human beings any more, the Apollo Belvedere no longer would be beautiful?
T: No.
E: I agree with regard to this conception of beauty, but not with regard to truth.
T: Why not?
E: I cannot prove that my conception is right but that is my religion. The mind acknowledges realities outside of it, independent of it. For instance, nobody may be in this house, yet that table remains where it is.
T: Yes, it remains outside the individual mind, but not the universal mind. The table is that which is perceptible by some kind of consciousness we possess.
E: If nobody were in the house the table would exist all the same, but this is already illegitimate from your point of view, because we cannot explain what it means, that the table is there, independently of us...We attribute to truth a superhuman objectivity.
T: In any case, if there be any truth abstoltely unrelated to humanity, then for us it is absolutely non-existing.
E: Then I am more religious that you are!
Bohr's view of reality - and the views of some other quantum physicists - had more in common here with Tagore's view than with Einstein's. For quantum theory maintains, like Tagore, that reality is dependent on the observer. In Science, said Einstein, "we ought to be concerned solely with what nature does." Bohr, however, insisted that it was "wrong to think that the task of physics is to find out how nature "IS". Physics concerns what we can say about nature."
Tying these ideas into my theory, I can say that I agree with Einstein AND Bohr, but moreso Einstein because it is not the "IS" that is the issue.. it is the "how and why" that is important...at least to me and in my theory. I dont like to believe that things around me are real. I like to think that everything around me is an optical illusion and thus my task is to find out how and why.. not what "is" because my eyes are deceiving me at this point.
(I so want to get to sleep but I am on a tangent and therefore I am going to remain up until my mind is satisfied with this)
"The state called here "the transitional phase" (Tibetan: "bardo") is the actual moment of change, occuring at the end of one phase and the beginning of the next. It is the state of flux itself, the only state that can really be called "real". It is a condition of great power and potential within which anything could happen. It is the moment between moments. It may seem to span an entire lifetime, like the moment between being born and dying, or it may be imperceptibly short and fleeting, like the moment between one thought and the next. Whatever its duration, however, it is a moment of great opportunity for those who perceive it."
I do not have a time limit for the time intellectual/conscious collections of energy leave the physical dead body and go back out into the "whole" of Universal Consciousness, and then regrouping with other collections of energies that go out to seek another fetus to inhabit. It is irrelevant at this point, however, when the Buddhists speak of the bardo, I tend to think of the various stages of evolution being "bardos".
I do not believe that time is fixed and solid. This for sure I can say I believe. I cannot prove it.. nor can anyone else at the present time.. but it is what I believe to be true at this point in.. well in "time" lol.
Now the question I pose is this: How does the energy, once it is released from the dead body and goes back out into the universal collection of energies, know what other energies to group with in order to create the human mind (after it groups with these energies and enters another fetus's brain to make it function). Does it have to do with similar memories of energy? This is another question that rolls through my mind throughout the day...every day.
This theory is still in progress and Ive added parts and stuff so feel free to discuss it with me. Again, It challenges many of the historical perceptions that have been lain down for us.....and Hopefully sometime in the future, I can make this into a more concrete/fixed theory.
Jamie