Quote:
Originally posted by Technosoul,
So you think Kerry was trying to take all the glory and not let let the lower grunts have any medals?
Wait, news flash, we are not voting on the best Action War Hero, we are voting on who would be a good President because they got a few brains. |
#1
As I wrote : "I do not care Kerry's medals"
#2
If I vote for a presidential candidate, then I would choose : Bush.
Many people are completely unaware, that we all (around the world) are facing energy crisis, and sooner or later we all all would fight for the oil, since that oil is the main source for the energy.
Computers - like the Watts' invention, steam machine - have entered a new era in Mankind's history. There are not enough new technologies people can create or develope to give all the people an employment. We need to make a shift (as it happened to a steam machine, along with new developements) into completely new technological fields. No one has an idea how to procede with that issue.
Example :
- no technologies to feed all the people
That is why Bush used U.N. Resolution #1441 to enter Iraq (among many other reasons), to "protect" steady oil supplies.
(
I am curious whether it has come as the result of any planning, but the oil is not that important as markets or intelligence and military bases in Middle-East region)
Some people say about "peace, rights, constitutions, ect." These values are not going to replace a reality, while exactly those people who write some "pacifistic ideas" will be hit (by energy and technology lacks) as well. But they do not care, today. A completely moronish approach. (I bet those people will blame everybody, but themselves, when they wake up tomorrow and "develope" the reality that surrounds them).
That is why the attempt to enforce a pro-democratic state in Iraq is the crucial task, for almost all the Mannkind's representatives. That is why if I vote, I would choose : Bush (regardless of his capabilities in any field).