Quote:
Quote by: Meleagar  It's a tangential expression of a provisional viewpoint. My argument about ID is based on evidence and logical inference. ID doesn't make any claims about "what is doing the designing" (other than in cases of human and animal ID), so my view on that is entirely irrelevant to any debate about ID. |
Your argument about ID is based on the existence of a "designer". There is nothing logical about that. That you and other IDists refuse to discuss the designer is a political decision not a scientific or logical one. You refuse to discuss the designer because you know it would expose the fact that ID is Creationism.