Quote:
Originally posted by LogicaLunatic,+--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (LogicaLunatic,)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin-Mia,
Questioning statements that obviously don't have any basis in fact is the appropriate thing to do, and Rainbow cannot be expected to debate until Castille clarifies his position. |
I'm back all...
Mia, no discussion about God in the history of our species has ever been based on "fact." It appears Rainbow can't be expected to debate at ALL. Castille provided the reasons he thinks the way he does. An appropriate, "debate like" response would be to explain to Castille why his/her take on Christianity is incorrect based on Rainbow's beliefs/knowledge.[/b][/quote]
Wrong. If Castille's "argument" is based on a logical fallacy, the fallacy has to be addressed and solved before any discussion or debate can take place.
Additionally, Castille asked questions, he didn't make any arguments. Rainbow and I are trying to clarify one of his questions so we can properly respond to them.
Until he has the guts to back up his assertions, no one should waste time on his topic.