Quote:
| And I believe the FBI/CIA to have more thorough methods of keeping a check on the population. |
I'm sure they do, but then again, they are equally as wrong. And a majority of Americans would oppose such methods if they were made public, whereas only 2% of Britons oppose cameras in principle.
Quote:
| That's the idea. a deterrent, and it seems to work. |
I have said it before and will say it again: the distinguishing feature of Oceania was that it was watched,
not that it was safe.
Quote:
| isn't my idea of freedom. |
It's part of mine. What gives you the right to restrict it?
Quote:
| you can say anything here, including 'I am gay' without causing a ruckus. |
You can say it here, too. There are several openly gay Congressmen and I think several thousand openly gay elected officials.
Grant you, it will cost you an election in certain parts of the country, but that's the voters' will. Freedom = freedom to do stuff without government intervention, not freedom from other people not wanting to associate with you.
Quote:
| no, because in practice, because of your 'system' you will only have 2 parties. |
*shrug* Again, the voters' will. There is less need for third parties anyway since the two major ones have historically adopted the policies of strong third parties.
Quote:
| And Germany restricts certain parties for understandable historical reasons. |
Maybe so, but that doesn't make them free.
Anyway, like I said, I'm only speculating. Freedom isn't something that can be quantified, IMO, or even defined, so this is all just philosophical rambling.