View Single Post
Old Sep 9, 2004, 08:43 pm   #9 (permalink) (top)
Liberty Landing
Igneous Magma
 
Posts: 299
Quote:
And I believe the FBI/CIA to have more thorough methods of keeping a check on the population.
I'm sure they do, but then again, they are equally as wrong. And a majority of Americans would oppose such methods if they were made public, whereas only 2% of Britons oppose cameras in principle.

Quote:
That's the idea. a deterrent, and it seems to work.
I have said it before and will say it again: the distinguishing feature of Oceania was that it was watched, not that it was safe.

Quote:
isn't my idea of freedom.
It's part of mine. What gives you the right to restrict it?

Quote:
you can say anything here, including 'I am gay' without causing a ruckus.
You can say it here, too. There are several openly gay Congressmen and I think several thousand openly gay elected officials.
Grant you, it will cost you an election in certain parts of the country, but that's the voters' will. Freedom = freedom to do stuff without government intervention, not freedom from other people not wanting to associate with you.

Quote:
no, because in practice, because of your 'system' you will only have 2 parties.
*shrug* Again, the voters' will. There is less need for third parties anyway since the two major ones have historically adopted the policies of strong third parties.

Quote:
And Germany restricts certain parties for understandable historical reasons.
Maybe so, but that doesn't make them free.

Anyway, like I said, I'm only speculating. Freedom isn't something that can be quantified, IMO, or even defined, so this is all just philosophical rambling.
Liberty Landing is offline   Reply With Quote