Quote:
Quote by: tinybear  Hey, what 'agenda' are you talking about? I was asked to provide statistics to show the relationship between homosexuality and promiscuity. So what search words did you expect me to use? |
You are being disingenuous, tiny.
Quote:
Quote by: tinybear Besides, you know why there is a dearth of similar statistics from gay-friendly websites which show that there is no connection between homosexuality and promiscuity, don't you? Surely, you can figure out why. |
Yes, I can figure out why, and it has nothing to do with suppressing facts, as you seem to insinuate.
if you seriously looked at the "gay-friendly" sites you
imply you have visited (and I know of plenty) - there is no shortage of sound medical facts and reliable statistics regarding sexual practices.
The difference between such sites and the ones you posted is that the gay sites aren't concerned with convincing everybody that gay sex is degraded and risky -
it isn't either (and certainly not more so than hetero sex acts) when it is practised responsibly.
The other thing is the absence of deliberate religion-inspired scaremongering tactics, since all intelligent commentators are aware that no-one is going to give up sex entirely, and therefore tailor their advice so as to be more realistic.
So, regarding your "agenda" - all I will say is that you can usually be relied on to present the negative case in gay issues. As I try to show above, you tend to provide quotes and links from shamelessly biased sources.
Bearing this in mind, how are we not going to conclude, after a while, that you do indeed have an understated agenda going on, an impression that is reinforced by the absence of anything of a supportive nature from you, if only as a token gesture in the interest of balance?