Quote:
Quote by: tinybear  See what I mean? All I did was post some statistics on homosexuality and promiscuity at the request of Cruella and I'm accused of bigotry. I bet no one paid any attention to those statistics. They are immediately ignored just because they were quoted by Christian groups. |
The fact is, tiny, googling "homosexual promiscuity" (as you evidently did, as shown by the tell-tale highlighted search words in the text of your links) - is hardly going to come up with an un-biased result, although it clearly betrays your agenda.
All three articles derive from a Catholic analyst - (one Dr. John R. Diggs) - who's views are so slanted that they are medically laughable.
For instance, his bias is seen even in the phraseology he employs - whenever a reputable scientific study relates the result of a survey, the words it invariably uses are judgementally neutral, which is as it should be... As in, say -- "the survey showed that 90% of the test group
reported having engaged in oral sex" ----- compare this with the use of the highly-emotive word "
admitted" (
as in "they '
admitted' having oral sex") ---- which is the very revealing formula used on these religious sites of yours.
In other words - blatant slanting so as to prejudice the reader in favour of the judgement they are pushing - never a reputable trick.
If I could be bothered, tiny, I could deconstruct your links in great detail to show the other numerous methodological faults, but the fact is, such garbage isn't worthy of so much of anybody's time. Suffice to say, each and every statistical claim can easily be refuted using a more honest methodology.
Particularly ironic, too, that all this preaching on promiscuity comes from a Roman Catholic source - the very church that is anti-condom - need I say more?