Volconvo Debate Forums - View Single Post

Aug 7, 2004, 11:54 pm

Jeez, one prior topic moved to butterface because of inane chatter and a second one on the way to an early graveyard. People, STOP posting unrelated 9/11 subjects! My goodness, a topic about a particular bad theory isn't an invitation for your favorite link on a different theory you believe to be true. A 'no plane,' 'pod,' or 'bad analysis of video frames' debunking topic is not an invitation for a 'pet goat story' or 'everything under the sun slightly related to 9/11' link.
--------------------------

Section 8,

Here goes:

1. Dave vonKleist's major claim to fame was writing a song dedicated to veterans suffering from Gulf War disease. I applaud him for that, but he has no qualifications for the 'evidence' presented in his atrocious video '9/11: In Plane Site'. Actually, the cute part is that that he admits on the advertisement site for the video to not drawing any conclusions. Just like FOX NEWS, he presents horribly twisted 'questions' using extremely weak 'evidence' and lets you 'decide.' Of course, if you take his crappy evidence at face value, you're gonna go down the rabbit hole and end up discrediting real research.

2. The 'evidence' presented is of such poor quality that, even if his basic questions (claims masked as such) were true, it wouldn't help at all. Staring at a bad video frame further altered by digitization and possible manipulation will only result in headaches.

3. The evidence presented is selective to the point of being absurd. A single witness statement, incomplete or taken out of context, is presented as the Gospel truth while the dozens of statements (hundreds if you dig hard enough) available on the Internet are ignored.

'In Plane Site' is the worst video on 9/11. There have been some horrible stinkers due to bad production value and asinine analysis, but this one takes the cake.

Simply click on the following link. You can also click on the link in the topic post, but the one below will take you directly to the analysis of the conspira-nut 'In Plane Site' section. However, feel free to browse the entire page as it has fascinating sections exposing
hoax theories.

"9/11: in plane site -- the worst film on the topic
is this grotesque incompetence, deliberate disinformation or a case of useful idiots used by covert operatives?"

Please, no blind responses. Don't reply unless you have read the link. Also, try to stay on topic.

Aug 7, 2004, 11:54 pm	#11 (permalink) (top)
StoneWT Guest Posts: n/a	Jeez, one prior topic moved to butterface because of inane chatter and a second one on the way to an early graveyard. People, STOP posting unrelated 9/11 subjects! My goodness, a topic about a particular bad theory isn't an invitation for your favorite link on a different theory you believe to be true. A 'no plane,' 'pod,' or 'bad analysis of video frames' debunking topic is not an invitation for a 'pet goat story' or 'everything under the sun slightly related to 9/11' link. -------------------------- Section 8, Here goes: 1. Dave vonKleist's major claim to fame was writing a song dedicated to veterans suffering from Gulf War disease. I applaud him for that, but he has no qualifications for the 'evidence' presented in his atrocious video '9/11: In Plane Site'. Actually, the cute part is that that he admits on the advertisement site for the video to not drawing any conclusions. Just like FOX NEWS, he presents horribly twisted 'questions' using extremely weak 'evidence' and lets you 'decide.' Of course, if you take his crappy evidence at face value, you're gonna go down the rabbit hole and end up discrediting real research. 2. The 'evidence' presented is of such poor quality that, even if his basic questions (claims masked as such) were true, it wouldn't help at all. Staring at a bad video frame further altered by digitization and possible manipulation will only result in headaches. 3. The evidence presented is selective to the point of being absurd. A single witness statement, incomplete or taken out of context, is presented as the Gospel truth while the dozens of statements (hundreds if you dig hard enough) available on the Internet are ignored. 'In Plane Site' is the worst video on 9/11. There have been some horrible stinkers due to bad production value and asinine analysis, but this one takes the cake. Simply click on the following link. You can also click on the link in the topic post, but the one below will take you directly to the analysis of the conspira-nut 'In Plane Site' section. However, feel free to browse the entire page as it has fascinating sections exposing hoax theories. "9/11: in plane site -- the worst film on the topic is this grotesque incompetence, deliberate disinformation or a case of useful idiots used by covert operatives?" Please, no blind responses. Don't reply unless you have read the link. Also, try to stay on topic.