View Single Post
Old Nov 21, 2003, 11:46 am   #15 (permalink) (top)
castille
Citizen #21521
 
Posts: 2,599
I never said anyone who differs from me in ideology is not a humanitarian. I might be sick, but hey, you're blind.

Reagan holds similiar political leanings to me, but I do not consider him a humanitarian. (for those of you who are blind, REAGON HOLDS SIMILIAR POLITICSL LANINGS TO ME, BUT I DO NOT CONSIDER HIM A HUMANITARIAN).


So there. I don't care what the hell their political beliefs are, I don't consider anyone who has a political cause to promote to be a humanitarian.


This includes Bush, Ghandi, Clinton, Adolf Hitler, Stalin, Meo, protestors, ultranationalists, communists, democrats, fascists, or whatever political cause.


There is a clear line between POLITICAL CAUSE and NON-BIASED HUMANITARIANISM.


Why didn't Ghandi help the people of China? Why didn't he help Angola, Malaya, Germany, Algeria, or anyone else? Why just Indian?

Why did Hitler only help Germany? He didnt even help Japan with her war.

Why did Stalin ONLY help the USSR? He stole resources from Eastern Europe to improve Soviet manufacturing.


I consider politics to be a very poor excuse for humanitarianism.


Ideological loyalty is the act of giving your soul to a vague concept, to be manipulated by people smarter than you.
castille is offline   Reply With Quote