Dec 4, 2008, 06:31 pm
|
#82 (permalink)
|
| Altruism Assassin
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 5,977
| Quote:
Quote by: RealRockingham 1) Firstly, you forget that the environment shapes the mental characteristics of humans and animals... a races genetic intellectual capacity is a RESULT of the environment it emerged in.
In any case, the Maya, the Cambodians, the Persians, the Indus civilisation..... all managed in one of the three environments you described. I wan’t to emphasize that West Africa and Sudan was actually better off from enviromental perspective(considering both the natural environment and the political environment) then the New World civilisations. Why were the latter better off? Because they were descended from a people which experienced selective pressures in favour of evolving a higher mental capacity... the Mongoloids.
2) We are talking about race not continent. The two are not synonomous.
3) I think it is significant to know thre things... firstly, the Egypt of the period of Nubian conquest was not racially the same to that of earlier. They had intermixed to a significant extent with blacks who had been taken in as slaves...
Secondly, the Nubian dynasty managed to conquer Egypt only in a time in which Egypt was in civil war. Egypt was conquered 100 years later by the Assyrians, demonstrating how feeble and impotent the Nubian dynasty was...
Thirdly, modern genetic tests show people from Ethiopia and Sudan(the modern day Nubians) to be 2/3 Caucasoid and only 1/3 Negroid.
4) Please... tell me your kidding. The Carthaginian’s closest modern relatives are the Lebanese(the native Lebanese, not the Palestinian refugees who now make up a large chunk of the population), who are considered even by many on racist communities like Stormfront to be borderline white. Carthage may also have been populated by Berbers(who are Caucasian) and Iberians (many of their latter monarchs, such as Hannibal, were actually part Iberian).
5) Sure, great nations existed in Africa- but these were not the result of BLACK Africans(with a few meager exceptions).
Name me just ONE great civilisation to have made real achievements that was racially pure negroid and had negroid rulers. JUST ONE.
History has shown, with remarkable consistency, that “civilisation” as we would define it is pretty much restricted to Caucasoids(which includes Semites) and Mongoloids, and to a significantly lesser extent Mullatoes. Also, the Dravidians have achieved it, though whether or not Dravidians are Caucasoid is the subject of much debate. | There is no such thing as racially pure in the real world. I can't pretend to do a genetic examination of a past civilisation.
“Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.”
-Albert Einstein |
| |