[Dislogic]

maybe but i think more of it had to do with George Bush's greed for personal wealth and the wealth of his family, friends, and collegues... not that there is anything wrong with that in general however there is something wrong with that when you send a nation to war for that reason when you are its representitive.

Also i do seem to recall that George Bush stated many times before the war that he was going to go to war because of WMD and that he did not believe that Suddam was telling the truth about this. That was his main arguement to go to war although i believe as i stated before that he had alterior motives for personal benifit. Besides like stated in an other thread somewhere... (forget which one) other countries are in the same and in some cases in more violation of what president bush seems to think is appropriate behavior for a nation other then the US but he is not going to war with them. I think we all know hes in it for the money, the facts just add up. i mean for instance, we have WMDs and whos to say considering president bushes outlandish behaviors in foriegn policy thus far he might not use WMDs to solve a problem that he is hell bent on having his way? And another thing... why is it ok for us to have WMDs and not others who is to judged us? us? that just doesent make sense because we will always side with ourselves on that one.

oh and i think i had something else to say that supported my poiint but i forgot it so i will post it later when i remember it.