[Sonart]

.

Quote by: tfox ??? uuuhhh she didnt receive a visit from the stork, she had sex. Your arguements make about as much sense as me pointing to some girls comprehensive sex education as the reason she got pregnant. .

You really are a literalist, aren't you.

Yes, she had sex. The point of 'Abstinence Only' is NOT to have sex. Therefore it obviously didn't work because she DID have sex. And since conservatives constantly preach that sex ed begins first and foremost in the home, with the parents, and since Sarah Palin advocates abstinence only, then there appears to be something wrong with either Palin's parenting or the concept of abstinence only.

Quote by: tfox And since Wasilla high school doesnt teach abstinence only, your arguement makes even less sense

Apparentlly Wasila High School doesn't teach much of anything.

Wasilla's lack of sex education -- "But since the announcement, the debate has turned to Palin's stance on sex education (in a gubernatorial debate she said she would not support explicit sex education), and it has caused me to remember my own sex education at Wasilla High School, the same high school Palin and several of her children attended.

To say it was lacking is far from accurate. It was abysmal."

Quote by: tfox Sounds like hes talking about the behavior of Brittney.

Except Britney's not pregnant, 16 yr-old Jamie Lynne is. Your point?

Quote by: Mrs.V Palin's daughter was taught "safe sex", and Abstenance in the home. Both obviously failed to prevent the pregnancy.

Yep, and conservative logic being that that would be the fault of the parents. So why is it not Sarah Palin's fault that her teenage daughter got pregnant out of wedlock?

Quote by: Mrs.V The question to be asked is, if she hadn't been taught there was a "safe" was to have sex, would she have had sex in the first place?

Since she didn't pay attention to that any more than she did her mother, who knows. But it's the parents responsibility, right?

RIGHT?

.