Thread: Animal Tests
View Single Post
Old Nov 16, 2003, 06:05 am   #26 (permalink) (top)
Pooeypants
Neo Moderator
 
Pooeypants's Avatar
 
Location: England
Posts: 5,609
</span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />Originally Posted by (G. Adams)

Nope, test on humans. But not criminals. if you volunteer, fine. I see life as life, I don't discriminate on species. At least a human can choose to have tests, (if we ignore my philosophy that there is no such thing as choice...), such choice is beyond animals.
<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'>
right, I see where this is leading. We'll communites (mainly poor ppl) living near companies that need testing, and we'd find lot's of ppl who mutilated etc from testing (obviously if you give money in exchange for testing you'd attract those at the lower end of societal rank).
I still see no problem with testing on convicted criminals, ppl who have commited crime which could lead to capital punishment or life imprisonment should be used, I see no point in wasting tax payers money on keeping him/her alive in a place where he gets free accomadation and food. Let them burn.


War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is strength
Harness the power of Ingsoc, then you can capture someone killed the year before
Pooeypants is offline   Reply With Quote