Quote:
Quote by: rez  Its called having no bias and assumptions. It helps along discoveries. It takes away the politics.
In the end it depends on what explanations work and which ones don't work. The ones that work get the credence.
You don't start with the answer and work your way backwards. You start with what you have and then work your way to the answer one step and a time. |
Of course is bias. Your starting from a basis that supports your own viewpoint and then building from there. Thats selective use of information to support your own debate.
Saying the God is nothing more than knowledge that has to be taught is not an absolute fact. It still remains your opinion on the matter because not everyone will agree with you on what you hold as a fact.
Quote:
There doesn't need to be a claim about god. What god? Whos god?
God is currently useless when explaining reality, so why would anybody claim it doesn't exist? We don't know and right now we don't need to know. Let's leave it at that.
|
There you go. Off on the "well a mechanic fixes my car so God doesn't exist."
People accept both scientific discoveries and God but you discount and demand either we accept only science as a valid explanation for everything known and unknown. Thats yet another opinoon Rez, not a statement of fact.