Only a mental midget would post an illogical reply like this one Pooey?
Quote:
|
Misleading information. The emissions from natural sources are part of the carbon cycle, for example, we will see large amounts of CO2 released in winters when a lot of plants die and decay but in the following Spring & Summer, it'll lock away that CO2 again. Therefore, the net is no significant increase (unlike when we do deforestation). However, we are pumping back into the atmosphere, carbon that has been sequestered over millions of years. We are causing the net increase of CO2 levels, if you doubt that fact then there's no point in debating.
|
You said I was misleading you? And then post an affirmation of the original statement?
Quote:
|
97% of CO2 emissions come from natural(mostly the oceans) rather than human sources
|
In order for your mental processes to grow maybe you can explain what is un natural about the oceans carbon cycle and whether it is rigid or flexible? Plus what causes it? There is little decaying vegetation in the 2/3 water coverage of the earth? Thats on land? The cycle is more of a function of warming and cooling of the oceans than it is of plant growth. Guess what nastural entity is responsible for the warming?
The answer is not CO2 or human carbon use?
Lets have a reasoned discussion rather that an ad hominem tussle. Your posts are over the edge of logic and accurate responsiveness. Frankly, you remind me of a juvenile who counters any fact because you feel you have to? Lately your posts have been ridiculous, illogical and reflective of a rigid mentality.