| Am I the only one who thinks the title of the thread topic should be "Creationism vs Science" instead? Because Creationism doesn't just fly in the face of evolution. Doesn't it reject astronomical, paleontological, geological, chemical, physical and botanical (the bristlecone tree) evidence to the contrary? I may have missed a few, but you catch my point...
vi veri veniversum vivus vici
Evolution: Link 1 |