Thread: Global Warming
View Single Post
Old May 28, 2008, 09:33 pm   #1415 (permalink) (top)
Deadeye
Hot Lava
 
Posts: 892
Quote:
Quote by: xyzer View Post
Sonart..
Here is what we are comparing. You do the math?

You throw in a scare figure of ..

Are you suggesting that none of the 1% of natural CO2 ever escapes the atmosphere, and it just keeps filling it up? What about the plants absorption of CO2, carbon sinks, etc? What natural balance level are you talking about and what is it? We alread know and you even mention it that the earths climate has varied dramitically in the past? Is it always in balance? Does that make sense?


Are you suggesting that the earth is in stasis" Suns warming doesn't change, volcanos always spew the same amount of gas, past climate changes don't affect the earth flora? CO2 just sits ther blocking the escape of heat?

We are talking about logic here, I hope.
I'm not sure I understand your drift.

Here's what I'm saying: The temperature of the Earth is changing and has always done so. Everybody must understand this fact.

The Earth has been in a long warming trend started after the end of the last Ice Age. We are still in that warming trend. It will eventually turn and we will experience another Ice Age. This has been happening for a very long time and the cycle has repeated many times.

Man made Global Warming fans believe that man is changing the climate of the Earth. This may or may not be so, but we do know for certainty that the temperature of the Earth is in constant flux and it will always be so. The warming or cooling of the Earth does not require the help of men to do so.

Even if you were to stop all production of man made CO2, for instance, the climate would change. Your side, the MMGW side claim that we are speeding things up, others say otherwise.

I do not believe that the evidence that man causes climate change is overwhelming enough for me to revise my lifestyles. It's been said that to effect mmgw it would require the expenditure of $500,000,000,000,000We can't afford that for something that is as iffy as mmgw. Whether we spend the cash or not the climate will change. So why bother?

I don't think that most guys posting here actually read the anti-mmgw scientific papers written by climateologists. There have been several good ones published lately.
Deadeye is offline   Reply With Quote