Quote:
Quote by: gallo  But you asked in the title, "Does science encompass God?" Why don't you make up your mind? That's the question I answered. So now we are left wondering exactly what your point is. You seem as confused as anyone. |
Calm down bro. Read the OP again if you don't know what's happening.
Quote:
|
Quote by: gallo Perhaps if you bothered to learn what science is and how it works you wouldn't make such remarks. That's what science does. It explores the evidence. If there is no evidence, then the question is outside the domain of science. |
An hypothesis can be made without evidence, and you pursue the question with science. We had no evidence of the strings in String Theory (not sure if we have any now either) but whether or not these strings exist is encompassed by science.
The very fact that religion claims that their god affects the natural world means that it is a question of science. Saying "yeah but there's no evidence of God" doesn't mean it's not a question of science, it means, if we take that statement into consideration, that science has ruled there is no evidence that God has or is affecting our natural world.
There is no good or acceptable evidence of Nessy. That does not mean a creature that supposedly lives in our natural world, in a effing lake, is not encompassed by the reaches of scientific inquiry. Come on, man.. lol