[Pooeypants]

Quote by: xyzer Pooey I suggest you reread some of your last few posts? They are irrational, suggesting you are just flailing away to support your rigid doctrinaire approach to climate science.

If you read any of your posts you'd see that you've never ever addressed or conceded to the points that I've rebutted. Instead, you will find that every few weeks you'll read the same question, just like as though we've never answered them. In fact, in this very post itself we can see the same point being raised which has already been covered.

Quote by: xyzer The IPCC is always right? CO2 is causing warming and its going to continue because CO2 is increasing due to human energy use? Don't deny that, please.

Merely gives a conclusion from all the collated research done so far. Their judgment is only as good as the research and the data they provide.

Quote by: xyzer Youve just been exposed to actual data which shows warming has stopped over the past few years?

You've also been told that the decreased warming is explained by the La Nina effect, unless, that is you would like to challenge this meteorological event? Furthermore, I'd like to point out your hypocrisy of crying how our modelling and measurements are flawed but as soon as something turns up that's in your favour, you're immediately on the bandwagon. So do I have to reference to La Nina effects on temperatures this decade or are you going to stop beating that dead horse and concede? I'm thinking you'll choose the latter and ask the same question again, and again...

Quote by: xyzer You just cant stand to have your views refuted or even challenged?

No, I welcome the challenge. But all that you provide are opinions and anecdotes.

Quote by: xyzer You are sounding more and more like a spoiled juvenile who cant have his way and keeps insisting those who don't think like you do are "liars, living in a dream world,imbued with fanatic denialist beliefs"? Are you serious? Are you who masquerade under the banner of a moderator on this site really up to supporting "fair and opposing" ideas? You who commonly resort to ad hominem comments in an effort to silence opposing opinion?

This is hilarious entertainment. Every post on every page dating back that I've responded to you has been met with little to no acknowledgement. It's like you've got some sort of selective amnesia or reading disability; you go blind when there's something you don't like to see, such as rebuttal material.
You've described yourself impeccably; a spoilt juvenile.

Quote by: xyzer Since when did facts and references to the opinions of many scientists become anecdotes?

Which facts did you refer to?