You people are ignoring the evidence I posted in posts # 246 and #248. The page you posted (
The Moon Hoax Debate ) recommends Clavius and Bad Astronomy for further reading. Neither of those sites has any credibility.
You all know who Jay Windley is.
Clavius: Conspiracy - about the author
He and his fellow posters got caught telling a big lie on the Clavius forum. It's all explained here.
ApolloHoax.net - The Dust-Free Sand Issue A strange scenario re sifted sand | GeologyRocks
Jay Windley ducked a question asked of him in reply #3 of this thread because it's the job of the Clavius forum to discredit any theory that goes against the official government version of anything and this was too clear for him to try to discredit without looking silly.
ApolloHoax.net - A question for Jay Windley
Bad Astronomy is also a government damage-control site. Look at the lame excuse the moderator gave for closing this thread.
http://www.bautforum.com/conspiracy-...smuggling.html
He closed it because he knew his people would just end up looking silly if they tried to discredit the theory put forth.
Just the fact that the Clavis and Bad Astronomy sites exist is circumstantial evidence that Apollo was a hoax as all the posters on their forums do not debate in good faith.
Some mistakes have been made by moon hoax-believers but I've never seen a mistake that, when corrected, proved they went to the moon.
There's lots of proof that they didn't go. You people are just ignoring it. You can't come up with any proof that they went.
You are just like the Black Knight in this video clip.
YouTube - Monty Python And The Holy Grail- The Black Knight