[Milton Bradley]

Quote by: Halofan48 People have provided evidence milton, you just choose not to accept it. Milton, if people are being killed, shouldn't we try to prevent that? just maybe? If there are alternatives, why not use them? Why should we doom many people to die simply because you want to be able to kill someone with ease? Ya that makes loads of sense

No, you have provided opinion. The only evidence you have can't be used against me, as I'm not a criminal.

Quote by: Halofan48 Also, if not ban guns, why not just make stricter gun control?

Go ahead, use the legitimate lasw to see if your idea is democratic, and diplomatic. I mean, you have nothing to fear with that solid reasoning, right.

Quote by: Halofan48 The only people who'd have anything to fear from this would be the people who would be denied a weapon because they would be found unfit to carry a gun.

Well, and people who think the anti-gunners are just apologists for tyrants.

Quote by: Halofan48 Also, there are other NLWs other than just tazers milton. Beanbag guns, are one.

Waltzing around the point again I see.


Answer the question... Do you sanction electric shock therepy in any other instances?

Quote by: Halofan48 Also, killing a criminal with a gun could be considered wrong since your denying them the right to a trial.

Gimme a break.

Quote by: Halofan48 Also, it wouldn't be under the amendment denying no cruel and unusual punishment since it would be to protect you from immediate harm and not sentenced by a court of law.

Perhaps if the government were empowered to act in that manor, but as it is, they're not, and I don't intend to vote for that idea if it comes to that.

Quote by: Halofan48 And really, in a police state, they'd probably want normal guns more, as to silence any insurrection easily and not spend more resources in trying to keep them quiet without killing them.

Oh, they have them, or have you forgotten.

Quote by: Halofan48 Yet, since you insist milton, i'll find some articles covering some stories of misuse of guns.

I'm well aware of the misuse of guns. What I'm not aware of is how that validates punishing me, as I am not misusing guns.


Beyond that, I still don't sympathize with the bleeding heart Liberal answer that we must all saccrifice to appease your fears. This is a free society, if you can't handle it, try moving where that have laws that afford that protection. Perhaps move to a gated community where guns are illegal, and security is provided


Why must your Liberal solutions always include asking all to saccrifice?

Quote by: Halofan48 Just a few quick stories i found in a few minutes showing that guns can be a dangerous item to be stored. You'll argue it's irresponsibility but since we can't do weekly checks with every gun owner, we'd need to have stricter control or no guns.

You mean "you think" we need blah blah blah...

Quote by: Halofan48 Oh lets not forget the homicide rate image sonart has posted many many times now.

What we should address is how you are conveniently in denial that that is not a point of contention, and drop it already.

Quote by: Halofan48 Now below are some sites that are likely to have a bias against guns, so i'm making sure u guys know ok.

Why, why should I address any of your links if they just reiterate the same garbage I have debunked over, and over again?

Quote by: Halofan48 This is all i'll post for tonight, i need to go to bed soon, so there ya go milton.

Thanks for nothing. Thanks for missing the entire point of "justifying your beliefs", and wasting my time. Thanks again, really appreciate it.