Quote:
Quote by: Foxfyre  The bandwagon I ride is the one that is willing to look at ALL the scientific data out there and currently that is weighted on the side of no unusual global warming occurring and on the side of AGW being an unimportant part of whatever warming is currently occurring. |
No, if you looked at all the scientific data you would arrive at the same conclusions as the IPCC. A panel of experts who review all the literature in the world about climate change. Are you claiming to have more scientific knowledge and wisdom than them?
Quote:
Quote by: Foxfyre You said 'one article invalidates all current scientific research.' Actually it validates some other research I've seen re an impending cooling trend and it doesn't claim to invalidate anything. |
Which research would that be? Please specify.
Quote:
Quote by: Foxfyre For me the paradox has always been why people like you with no apparent expertise in climate science are so EAGER to believe the AGW religionists. What's in it for you? Why are you so desperate to negate all the really persuasive evidence out there that there may not be so serious a problem as the religionists say there is? |
The paradox here is that you have a fanatical belief that human activity has nothing to do with global warming, even though you claim to look at all scientific evidence. That you'll be willing to take the words of a few based on sketchy or incomplete results is evidence of your bias. What is it that drives a denialist such as yourself?