Quote:
Quote by: lsbskins1 This is a point that has been adressed before. We license drivers, we regulate cars to a much greater degree than we do guns, despite the fact that human death is an unfortunate side effect of automobile use and the freakin designed purpose of a gun. Add the fact that, as has been stated and established, per use death rates are considerably lower for automobiles and the economic necessity is far greater. You trot this out all the time, but it is not an effective point on almost every conceivable level. |
That's a matter of opinion, and as usual, you attempt to marginalize the opposition for not agreeing with your arbitrary decisions.
So, is there really only room for one line of thinking on an issue?
Quote:
Quote by: lsbskins1 Right. That is why wars are fought with Jeeps and Hummers causing the greatest number of combat deaths, 'cause cars are more efficient death dealers than guns. |
Silly attempt at sidetracking.
Quote:
Quote by: lsbskins1 Quote me the statistics that say most gun death crimes are committed with hunting rifles. |
Show me where I allege anything of the sort?
Quote:
Quote by: lsbskins1 Alright, Mr. "Original Intent, I've read all the words of the founders and am intimately familiar with the reasoning of the time", now you are claiming the founders had any idea that we would have the type of weaponry we have today and meant for everyone to have access to assault rifles? Who is living in fantasy land now? |
I contend
you are still living in the Fantasy World. After all, it is still you trying to dictate new terms, therefore it is you who is not content with the reality which surrounds you.
Quote:
Quote by: lsbskins1 You are willing to twist truth and logic until they are their own opposite numbers, plain and simple. |
Sorry, but I fail to see any "twisting" of the logic from my end, but I do notice an absence of answers to my questions, as usual.
Try answering this one...
How would an "armed Militia" arm itself ( which was the understanding ) if the manufacture, sales, and possesion of "arms" is illegal?