[gallo]

Quote by: LOGAN As I said, go claim your reward...for you are the FIRST IN HISTORY to prove that Evolution is a "proven" fact.

That's pretty muddled. He's the first to "prove that evolution is a proven fact"? What exactly does that mean? It is especially muddled and unclear since you are supposedly talking about science. You don't seem to know what it is or how it works. Finally, there aren't any scientists anywhere who are offering any such reward as you claim. Either you didn't understand the offer or you have no idea of what a scientist is, or both.

Thus we now have a new physical Law. "The Law of Evolution" as defined by the egghead "Zharic" the great.

If you had bothered to learn the basics of science you would know that facts don't grow up to become laws. Laws are just simple observations that are used by science as part of the complex structure of complex theories. Some examples of scientific laws are the law of conservation of charge, the law of conservation of energy/matter, the law of dominance, the law of gravitation, the law of independent assortment, the law of inertia, the law of large numbers, the law of segregation, the law of superposition, the laws of thermodynamics. Those are all laws of physics, math, chemistry, or biology. They are statements about phenomena that seem to always be observed in certain specific circumstances. They are used, along with other observations, hypotheses, predictions, and tests to build scientific theories. For example, the laws of segregation and independent assortment are both part of Mendel's theory of genetics.

Now all that is left is for "YOU" to prove it in a "repeatable experiment" and observe one life form morphing into a complete new creature...IN NATURE.

He did show you that it was repeatable. And why is it necessary to show some organism morphing into a "complete" new creature? What does that have to do with it? Do you know what evolution is? What exactly would an "incomplete" new creature look like?

And if you can observe it in nature I am sure the are plenty of "fossil" remains of before and after.

Before and after what? What are you talking about?

Just when can we expect your picture on the front of NEWS WEEK, TIME,etc? Most amuzing.

Did I miss yours? By the way, what does "amuzing" mean?

Oh buy the way good job of pasting and parroting in the form of "pseudo knowledge" or the false claim of having facts.

Do you mean "by the way"? What pseudo knowledge are you talking about? How about your knowledge of science. Show us where he is wrong and why. Show us the facts that you claim to have. Mythology doesn't count.

Again, I am about to fall from the chair, in uncontrollable laughter.

Been reading your Bible again?

Simply due to the pomposity and arrogance presented.

So you think that your pomposity and arrogance is a joke? For someone who dares to attempt to discuss a topic with so little knowledge, you are indeed arrogant.

Do you actually believe that anyone really accepts your demonstration as anything other than denying reality, when you were proven wrong?

Who proved him wrong? Just denying facts is not proof of error. You'll need more than "I don't believe it" before you will be worthy of respect.

CHILDREN, CHILDREN. Logan

We know. Learn. Then speak.