Quote:
Quote by: gela  No, we can't prove that.
But at the same time, its meaningless to say that 'matter can't creat itself, therefore it must have been created by a creator'
Because under that logic, the creator must have been created by a creator.
If your open to the idea of something that has always existed, and always will exist, then its meaningless to say it can't be matter, but it can be a 'creator'.
I wasn't trying to prove that there is no creator, I was disproving that there is a creator, under the reasoning presented. |
I think we come back to the same point, which goes as follow :
- are you questioning (mem)Branes Theory ?
If "yes", present your arguments, please.
Neither side has arguments to support their view - using scientific means, today, so far.
The core factor is :
- an atom possesses No ability and/or characteristics of self-creation
This is a fact, according to the Science. That is the key element that makes the whole case stronger for Theists.
In contrary, Atheists await for new developments and/or discovery that would deliver a completely new data on an atom's structure and/or characteristics and/or attributes, etc.
That is why Atheists reject Creator existence. And that points to Psychology and/or Sociology related issues, instead and indeed.
And the winner is ?
(Obama) :-)