Quote:
Quote by: Sonart  .
Complete nonsense, because if he were looking at all the evidence, he would have concluded long ago that anthropogenic global warming is a fact, because the overwhelming majority of the evidence says so.
That's what Xyzer simply ignores the information we've posted and continues to post old, long ago debunked nonsense from a small coven of mostly non-scientist deniers.
Oh goodie... yet another conservative economist weighing in on science.
And yet, oddly enough, here's what the real scientists at George Mason University have to say... --"With the global warming debate heating up in the news lately, researchers at George Mason University and the independent Center for Ocean-Land-Atmosphere Studies (COLA) recently conducted a comprehensive, and somewhat controversial, study that showed global warming estimates for the next century might be higher than we think.
It predicts higher estimates of global warming – 4 to 5° C as opposed to the model consensus range of 2 to 4° C – may be more likely."-- June, 2006  . |
I don't believe those are climate scientists. They are mathemeticians, statisticians. And now two long years later after their analysis was published, I am guessing any of them, assuming they have professional integrity, would agree that nobody's models are holding up under close scrutiny or scientific analysis.
In fact from what I've read, the models can't predict what we know the climate to be now using known data that is available. So how reliable can we trust any projections to be?
Which was Walter Williams point when he listed all the scientific brilliance forecasting this gloom and doom scenario or that scary trend etc. etc. etc. all of which have proved to be baseless.
His point, which you seem to have missed, is why are so many so eager to jump on this newest doomsday scenario when so much of the scientific evidence coming out shows it to be just another scientific scam whether intentional or not.