Typical juvenile logic? Attack the messenger! My ancient sources are better than your recent
sources?
Quote:
Complete nonsense, because if he were looking at all the evidence, he would have concluded long ago that anthropogenic global warming is a fact, because the overwhelming majority of the evidence says so.
That's what Xyzer simply ignores the information we've posted and continues to post old, long ago debunked nonsense from a small coven of mostly non-scientist deniers.
|
How about you ignoring the current
measured facts and adhering to the doom and gloom scenario reported by the IPCC more than 10 years ago?
NASAs satellite record of the last few years is ignored and hyperbole is brought out? Messengers who bring updated, contrary evidence are discarded forthwith if they dont agree with the dogma?
No ones ignored valid data you have posted nor the the tripe you have posted Sonart. It's you who doggedly ignore the latest facts which dispute the IPCC conclusions of near a decade back? Are you living in a rigid cocoon that cant be dented by facts? Sounds like it? Are you serious in posting this?...
Quote:
|
he would have concluded long ago that anthropogenic global warming is a fact,
|
Are you suggesting that science is closed before all the factsd are in? Are you suggesting that scientific hypotheses are rigid and un changing as new facts and data are revealed? Wow!