Quote:
Quote by: Simonius  That is possibly the only thing you have said that I would agree with! |
We have about 4 or 5 good explainations that can be developed and related. The hang up is that each group is demanding proof that cannot yet be fully delivered on. We have no need for a big rush to seal up the deal for one group or another, because we can survive well enough with a diversity of explanations.
But people fear or they dislike a state of confusion about this topic. They want to pursue some mass agreement that can unite everyone under one roof.
At this point there is no reason to all agree. And each group does not have to be open minded and they each can concentrate on what they do the best to improve their own opinons.
I find research on "concept construction" interesting. I find evolution interesting, and I find nature based ideas interesting, and I.Q creationism related in a new ager way of interest. I like diversity and find debating fun. And yes, mythology is interesting along with ways to apply it. And also I pursue ways to explore the limitations of faith and ritual. But that is just me and clearly not what everyone else is into. I am not drawn towards an interest in phyics.
But hey, it is not like we are having a election to see which explaination will win the popular vote to become the president of ideas.
I will however continue my explaination about creationism in my next postings. Why? Because some preacher told me it would be impossible to do when I was a teenager, and that rebel is still alive and wants to kick some butt.