Quote:
|
Quote by: OFE They banned alchohol using constituional methods.... all methods of prohibition since have not been done this way, since they WITNESSED its failure when the people don't support their illogical, central government, all powerful motives. |
?
I'm missing the argument.
Do you mean that prohibition's lack of success lead to a smaller chance of constitutional amendments?
I think there is enough support for popular direct elections that there could be a constitutional amendment (whether people care enough is another story).