View Single Post
Old May 10, 2008, 10:36 am   #53 (permalink) (top)
Simonius
Molten Ash
 
Posts: 140
Quote:
Quote by: BorisTheFerret View Post
But I just gave you one! Sparta!
.
I've never seen any evidence for that sorry, sex with young men, pre-pubsecent boys... no.

Quote:
Quote by: BorisTheFerret View Post
What about the Egyptian pharoahs? They often married their siblings.
Yes they did, but as they have not been around for over two thousand years I can't really see that as proof of legal incest in the modern age!

Quote:
Quote by: BorisTheFerret View Post
SEXUAL attraction, when acted upon and directed towards a THIRTEEN year old girl, IS sick.
I refer you to my previous answer, its just acting on urges that are shared by 90% of the male population. Wrong perhaps, terrible, awful, evil whatever adjective you want... but not sick, sick suggests to me some malfunction, something against nature. Sex with a young teenager is natural, I am not arguing its right.

Quote:
Quote by: BorisTheFerret View Post
Society has deemed it sick, that's why the age of consent is sixteen and not thirteen. End of.
But this time next century the age of consent could be 30, or 7 or 37!
Simonius is offline   Reply With Quote