Quote:
Quote by: Technosoul  Because after getting elected their officals did something so their votes are not counted. Which was unfair to the people they were supposed to represent. Why punish voters if they got double-crossed by some officals who broke that trust? |
Because the people have redress against those officials.
Changing the rules now is unfair to all of the candidates.
Did I mention Obama wasn't even on the ballot in Michigan?
Quote:
|
Your opinon about Clinton is bais due to your belief in conservative Bushism and the lies they like to project.
|
Wrong. Nice asinine assumption about my political views, though.
Quote:
|
So more black people will vote in order to take pride in his win. But that is not a good reason when the plantform ideas and experience is more important of a reason, and the super deligates know that, which is why most of the experienced party leaders favor her. She is still ahead if in the super deligates arena. And their numbers could determine the final nod for nominee.
|
I see, so your hypocritical position is that on the one hand, when if benefits Clinton, we should go with The Will of The People, rules about elections be damned. On the other hand, when it benefits Clinton, we should go with what a bunch of lifetime career politicians and smoke-filled-room backscratchers say, to hell with The Will of The People...
Remind me who is letting their bias influence their thoughts?
Quote:
|
The Clintons know how to win and would win if all votes were counted. Bill won two major elections and she won twice in New York. Stop allowing people to fowl up the damn election procedures at voting booths.
|
You mean superdelegates? Oh, wait, they're in favor of Clinton. See, you like allowing people to fowl up the election procedures when it benefits your bias.
Laughable.