Quote:
Quote by: Technosoul  what is consistant with logic?
To create something it must come from out of nothing. Otherwise you are just moving stuff around into a different shape or formula. Organizing what already is. |
This does not seem to be a logical start, The question appears to be what theory accounts for the form that life takes, not the ultimate source of matter.
Quote:
Quote by: Technosoul As somethings replace nothing you run out of nothing to do a lab test with, so we must turn to logic to answer the question.
It is my proposal that "thought" ( consciousness and the invisible essence of Mind ) can be counted as "the link" or medium between no-thingness and something. Thought becomes self-evident even it we cannot put it into a testube to find out what it is made out of.
Thought can generate energy and that vibration ( aka brainwave ) can be detected by science. Evidence of the mind that is otherwise a metaphysical concept.
I would agree that the first "thought" was a random occurance, and was not "created" by a No-Thing. If just occured out of the blue so to speak.
And the first thought was reproductive of more thoughts which I claim formulated the final "Mind" which pre-dated the universe and life on earth.
Even if you do not wish to call this explaination "science" it is still a good explaination that is logical. And should be mentioned in a science class that seeks to provide understanding about our "orgins". Because only in a science class would the concept maintain some degree of logical deduction and thusly, would not wander off into some religious philosophy. |
But all you have posted appears to simply be religious philosophy, instead of just looking at evidence and making rational theories you have come up with interesting and elaborate theory and description of a creator, its very nice but it is putting the cart before the horse surely?