Quote:
|
Don't be so naive! The left don't even know what they are arguing for.
|
I must not be 'left', because I know what I'm arguing for: the keeping of promises. I must admit, it sucks that, apparently, the only politician who keeps a promise is a douche.
I really don't care to discuss him, anymore: I'm not a part of his electorate, so his campaign activities are insignificant, to me. You know far more about him than I ever care to know, and I'm certainly not going to research the guy so I can find out if he's worth defending.
My position on this is simple: the situation you originally stated did not, necessarily, imply wrongdoing. If you'd like to argue about that, I'll take you up on it, but it seems a bit moot.
Quote:
|
Just curious how old are you? I would bet highschool?
|
Judging from your habit of trying to discredit your opponent on some grounds other than what they say, I think the less you know about me, the better. If it's not my age, you'll use my occupation, or my hair color, or something equally insignificant (like, say, the company I keep). Perhaps now, you'll try to discredit me in future debates "because I'm reticent". You can't seem to control your prejudices, so I'll just deny you the grounds on which to make prejudgment. Behold, my disembodied voice! Oh, how will you argue against it, when you don't know where it comes from? It may be time for that debate tool of last resort:
thinking about what it says!
Don't hold me to that, though: I'd kinda like the ladies to know my age :)