Quote:
Quote by: GHook93  Jumping to the winning side huh?
Why the hell would McCain debate him? Your "new" candidate won't even debate Clinton and they are still in a contested race. RP is in the race in spirit only. Heck that was what he was like from the beginning. Ron Paul has som very very valid points (that is if the porker practices what he preached), but RP was never really in the race. Still only 14 delegates! That is well dwarfed by Huckabee and Romney. 2 guys that have been out of the debate for a while. On top of that McCain wrapped up the nomination a while back.
It wasn't that large after-all and the well educated part is very debatable.
They are polar opposites politically except on the war; therefore, if they share a base, then either RP voters weren't educated or considered him only a 1 trick pony.
You understand nothing about RP if you think they only differed "somewhat." Would Obama been OK with doing away with the federal reserve and going back to the gold standard? Would Obama have been alright with cutting all social welfare programs? Would Obama be alright with giving up his dreams of UHC? Would Obama be alright with remaining idle in the face of the genocide in Sudan? Just to name a few.
Your mind is set on the D's! McCain nor the Republicans would benefit so its would be stupid for him to commit to it.
4 delegates is not going to change anything and it turned out to be a tie!
It is only good for a moral victory CNN Political Ticker: All politics, all the time Blog Archive - Obama holds Guam lead with largest precincts still to be tallied « - Blogs from CNN.com |
Paul was comparing his idea not to have a war in Iraq with the viewpoints of Obama. The domestic issues were not what he was indicating when he "in spirit only" suggested that Obama was originally close to his idea about that war.
In spite of what you said that debate would be popular and interesting, although I agree it will never happen.
How do you like the title for my new post about the Guam Primary win?
I used that title just because of your objective nature. My eye-catching headline read "Obama wins primary by only 7 votes".
Of course I will unite behind the winner in the Democratic primary, what else did you expect? The idea is not to stop Clinton or Obama, it is to stop McCain and to prevent another four years of Bushism policy.