View Single Post
Old May 2, 2008, 07:24 pm   #117 (permalink) (top)
HelioPrime
Hucking Fuskies
 
HelioPrime's Avatar
 
Location: Conn
Posts: 2,286
Quote:
Quote by: davedes View Post
2) If it was verified that no brain activity exists during a conscious OBE/NDE, that would give a lot of support to the idea of NDE afterlife.

I don't see how either of your points relate to the NDE afterlife being bunk, much less "NDE being bullshit." Please provide some sort of factual and/or intelligent reasoning if you wish to get any further with this argument.
I'm not trying to say NDE's are bunk but I've been around this forum enough to know hows thats going to be attacked.

Scientific folk are never going to give credit to firsthand accounts. If you have someone claiming an experience after a near death event with zero brain activity I'd agree and say thats pretty affirmative afterlife evidence.

But science says you can't think without the brain and brain activity we can verify. So if we don't see any activity then according to science were supposed to doubt you. Ration people are only supposed to give credit to that which is scientifically verifiable.

It's kind of a wall for science really. An experience in the afterlife during such an event could leave no traceable forms of evidence. So because of this according to science we should always reject and ideas of the afterlife. Science hits the wall because it can't consider unknown beyond measure events.


What do you say to an atheist who sneezes?
Yourdeadthatsit!


- Dane Cook
HelioPrime is offline   Reply With Quote