Quote:
Quote by: HelioPrime  Seems science demands one of two things:
1) Find us evidence that you are even having brain activity while dead or in a state in which case NDE's are clearly BS.
2) Don't find any brain activity in which case all NDE people must be full of shit.
Either was NDE used as an example of an afterlife could never be scientifically accepted. Which means according to science we all rational people should ignore NDE's and not believe in an afterlife. |
NDEs are tightly linked with OBEs, and as such they should be studied by mainstream science. It would be absolutely
ludicrous as rational people to inogre investigation into such an interesting and potentially benefitial topic.
Why are you lot so intent on "disproving" NDEs and removing them from mainstream science? Regardless of the truth in the claims of afterlife/veridical perception, we should still study these topics.
As for your points:
1) Brain activity while dead... That pretty much screams "afterlife." But using the EEG, we know this is not the case. In any case, brain activity during a OBE/NDE does not equate to "NDE is BS."
2) If it was verified that no brain activity exists during a conscious OBE/NDE, that would give a
lot of support to the idea of NDE afterlife.
I don't see how either of your points relate to the NDE afterlife being bunk, much less "NDE being bullshit." Please provide some sort of factual and/or intelligent reasoning if you wish to get any further with this argument.