| None the less 0 = zero.
What you said is the the Big Bang Theory based on physics is just a lot of Existentialist Crap. (also). So what is the point of demanding such math to prove a theory if it is just crappy science?
So you disprove of a theory, such as the theory of evolution and the theroy of the big bang. Good. We do not wish to confuse truth with theories. That will help to reduce a lot of time wasted in those science classes by not teaching any sort of theory. And please note I did not claim to be presenting a theory. Only an explaination.
Ha, so the young monkeys swam across the ocean to the other islands to teach the older monkeys, but that is not what they witnessed happening at all. The same kind of behavior was witnessed in the study of a monkeys in Africa and South Amreica where they learned to open shells with a rock or stick. Which had nothing to do with the introduction of sweet potatos. It matters not if they make up their own theories or explainations for what is being witnessed. I have as much right to do the same concerning my more logical explaination of those observations. I did not use the word "supernatural". I coined the term "designer behavorism".
What fact did I discard and how would that fact prove that my explaination is not true? What caused each tribe of monkeys to learn to do the same thing on different island seperated by an ocean? How could they know what the monkeys on the first island had learned and then copy it a generation later? Did they all learn it form a supernatural sweet potato? Your explaination or theory is not answering those questions and it is bias to the logic that my explaination has offered. I might agree that the science of monkey epidemiology is questionable science, but the problem of random errors is not as dominate in animals as it is in humans. Only the bias interpretations of the information is potentially a problem. The bias factor however can work equally for both sides of a debate, but my bais is prone to be more logical.
Are the monkeys into mind reading or remote viewing? Is that what you wish to propose? |