Quote:
|
My argument is that God made the rules, ergo he can break them. It's religion, not science.
|
Deus ex machina.
Quote:
Religion isn't science.
But in scientific terms, it comes up with it's own answer to the theory science lacks.
|
Which is extremely inappropriate. That is a task for theoretical, rationalistic sciences.
Quote:
But energy can not be made or destroyed according to physics.
A new law saying that energy can not be destroyed once created?
You know as well as I do, that makes no sense.
Your hypothesis is as week as mine, "it just always existed".
|
Scientists have observed through many experiments they can neither create or destroy energy, no matter what they do, and they have never seen an instance where energy is created or destroyed. Therefore, they articulated through language the idea that energy can be neither created or destroyed. Scientists are not obligated to stick by that idea. If they find evidence that energy can be created or destroyed, then they will revise their assessments and move on.
Energy could have somehow "popped into existence" at some point in the distant past, and may be irremovable now that it is here (hence, it can be neither created or destroyed now that it is here, but it wasn't always in existence). I don't know. But it cannot be observed, and is therefore non-empirical, and is therefore non-practical science. Hence, it is regulated to theoretical physics.