[SoylentGreen]

Technosoul What? You need evidence for what a mind is?

What I need is a creationist who will not provide titles like

Creationist evidence #1.

and then not provide the evidence.

Not crap, mathimatics.

1+1=2 is mathematics. Giving numbers arbitrary meanings such as consciousness is symbolism , eg existentialist crap.

The point is that science cannot detect consciousness any more then a creationist can detect it as the source. You cannot really detect the past or future, it is all a matter of establishing a propersition but yet, ..... we can experience mind and conscousness first hand. .

Typical double speak. How is it science or creationists cannot detect that which apparently every one else can experience?

Nor can you prove the mathimatical idea of nothing with evidence, only by the total subtraction of known events or things.

Yes it can. In fact until a mathematical idea can be proven with empirical evidence to its validity it remains only one of many theories, not truths.

Can conscousness exsist outside of the mind you asked. Scientific studies have found evidence that would favor such a propersition.

Again the misuse of the word evidence.
Scientist have witnessed a phenomena and given theories to explain it . No evidence has been produced and the 100th monkey is a questionable proposition.

That study would suggest the possibility of an Overmind that each member of a species is connected too, beyond group thinking (monkey see monkey do) or individual consciousness

It suggests nothing of the kind.
Fact: the potato and other foods were introduced to the animals as a new food source.
An unusual change in circumstances that resulted in the unusual method of a youngster of a species teaching the elders a new trick.
Since the food was introduced at the same time throughout the islands then the passage of knowledge would be similar. Nothing supernatural about it.

And based on that evidence I can claim that behavior designership is involved in controlling speices advancement. Aka - evolution.

But you have presented no evidence. Only a theory that chooses to disregard the facts .