The mere fact that these ridiculous fantasies are being discussed on a serious level with candidates is disgusting!!
What source is there for this "hypothetical" garbage about Iran nuking Israel? What source except the mouth of George Bush and the propaganda that his administration has been spreading regarding Iran?? Even their own real reports show Iran is not a threat, it's only bush and his cronies who have been spreading this lie that Iran wishes to nuke israel.
It is absolutely irresponsible of journalists to even be asking these kind of divisive, provocative questions and by doing so they are creating further damage and tension between America and Iran and are contributing in their way to stirring up trouble.
Do they even take into account that the land of israel is muslim holy land? You think a bunch of fanatic muslims would nuke their own mecca?!?! They may want the jews out of there, but they don't want to destroy the entire region. That's the whole issue! They want the land for themselves! How could they get that if they turned it into an atomic wasteland?
This is just evidence that trading one of these so called "liberal democrats" for Bush is a farce! They are all the same!
PS: the hilary strangelove thing is great. Her comments definitly remind me of a few characters in that film. One of the characteristics of militaristic war mongering fools is that they are constantly thinking up ridiculous hyperbolic "hypotheticals" which they use to justify further "pre-emptive" military action and attacks.
Quote:
The Saudi paper called Clinton's nuclear threat "the foreign politics of the madhouse," saying, "it demonstrates the same doltish ignorance that has distinguished Bush's foreign relations."
The Saudis are not always sound advisers on American foreign policy. But they understand that Rambo rhetoric like Clinton's only plays into the hands of Iranian hard-liners who want to plow ahead with efforts to attain a nuclear weapons capability.
|
Some great comments from that article.