[Zhavric]

Quote by: LOGAN What is nonsensical is to declare any theory as having validity in the physical world. An "IDEA" is still only and idea, paint it, white wash it, declare it truth, tell us that this idea was arrived at through the scientific method, still it is nothing but a speculation based upon a few known facts, nothing more, nothing less, and it certainly is not valid as the TRUTH. If indeed it were "empirical", as was suggested....we would empirically have a physical law and not a speculation. The semantics used to describe this theory is an indoctrination into secular humanism on a play of words to take advantage of the gullible. What we are lead to do is to accept this "idea" as truth until a better truth comes along. The truth does not evolve, what was true yesterday is true today. An example would be the speculated age of the universe, the "so called truth" has evolved from being declared as 4 billion years to 13.7 billion years in just one generation, showing the absurdity in accepting anyones idea as a truth. Thus, the first theory/idea was proven to be a lie, why should we blindly accept this next theory/idea as truth, when the last has fallen as a scientific LIE.? Instead of declaring the real truth of "we have reached an impasse of human comprehension", we merely speculate as to what that truth "might" be, until science and technology advances to add more speculation on top of an already unfounded speculation of truth. It's a house of cards waiting to be toppled by the next best idea. Always learning, but never coming to the knowledge of the truth. AND YES, THE "TRUTH" IS OFTEN FOUND TO BE "UNDEBATABLE", for the truth allows no room for human speculation. Logan

Thank you for boldly declaring that you're woefully unaware of the facts surrounding science and evolution. Please take the time to educate yourself. You can begin here. The University of Berkley has put together an excellent walkthrough of the common misconceptions of evolution. Amongst them...

Misconception: “Evolution is ‘just’ a theory.”

Response: Scientific theories are explanations that are based on lines of evidence, enable valid predictions, and have been tested in many ways. In contrast, there is also a popular definition of theory—a “guess” or “hunch.” These conflicting definitions often cause unnecessary confusion about evolution.



Misconception: “Evolution is a theory in crisis and is collapsing as scientists lose confidence in it.”

Response: Scientists do not debate whether evolution (descent with modification) took place, but they do argue about how it took place. Details of the processes and mechanisms are vigorously debated. Antievolutionists may hear the debates about how evolution occurs and misinterpret them as debates about whether evolution occurs. Evolution is sound science and is treated accordingly by scientists and scholars worldwide.