Quote by: Rainbow There is not much sense to post Hillary (Clinton) achievements in Politics, since there is none to be accomplished so far - (maybe except for some piteous speeches she gave on the House floor).
Hillary (Clinton) claims otherwise.
Example : Bosnia.
Putting that "sniper fire" aside, what Hillary (Clinton) participated in ?
No idea, since she had No the U.S. governing body's authorization to handle Any issues and/or subjects at all (!)
Hillary (Cllinton) went to Bosnia and took her daughter with her. All that at the expense of taxpayers (!) These are the facts.
What did Hllary (Clinton) went to Bosnia for ?
Example : Hillary is (allegedly) well known to and/or recognized by politicians around the world
A complete baloney. Bill (Clinton) - as the U.S. President, used to take Hillary with him. That custom is practiced by some politicians all over the globe.
Is that form of experience Hillary (Clinton) talks about ?
That is not enough, to be classified as an individual well familiar in/with Politics.
(Yesterday) I watched an interview with the Rev. Wright. He pointed nothing against Obama. Yet, I beleive Rev. Wright could perform much better as a politician, instead, IMO.
Applying Mathematics to the Democratic Party race, Hillary (Clinton) has No chance to catch up with Obama. In order to become a leading candidate, Hillary (Clinton) needs to win :
- All the remainging states, with ratio : 66% vs. 33%
She did not deliver that in Pennsylvania.
North Carolina is the last state with the most delegates to be won. Hillary (Clinton) needs to win that state, with much greater ratio of appx. 70% vs. 30%, in order to compensate the losses in Pennsylvania.
I do not think it would materialize, since Obama has a decisive lead in North Carolina with appx. ratio of 60-65% vs. 35-40%
HealthCare is yet another factor in Hillary (Clinton)'s campaign.
Some guys have no clue that exactly Hillary (Clinton) was that driving-engine to reform healthcare plans in 90's. A plan - officially introduced by Bill (Clinton)'s governing body, was her idea. As the result, number of uninsured people went up, from appx. 17 million to 50 million.
Today, Hillary (Clinton) claims that she has a brand new healthcare plan for all the Americans. That is an absurdal statement.
Hillary (Clinton) is being financed by lobbyists. Those guys paid her up, in order Hillary (Clinton) to become the next U.S. President.
Why ? Why somebody wants Hillary (Clinton) to take over that post - having in mind a health insurance coverage ?
Because, as the U.S. President Hillary (Clinton) is going to issue set(s) of Bills and/or Acts, etc. and force people to enroll on those healthcare plans. Healthcare-related business does not finance Hillary (Clinton) for fun. They want their money back. Since Hillary (Clinton) can not give them that money back - personally, she will accomplish that task at the expense of the People - Themselves (!) When the People enroll on those - already prepared - healthcare plans and/or coverage, they would need to follow certain procedures.
What does it mean in practice ?
Doctors pay some fees to healthcare insurance companies, in order doctors to be listed as "certified" within those plans. When a patient and/or client and/or customer enrolls on that plan, that individual is being taken care by those doctors, and Only (!) By complying with those requirements :
- doctors have profits
- healthcare insurance companies have profits
- guys have bills to be paid ; ammount varries
That is the way Hillary (Clinton) wants to return the healthcare insurance companies' investment back. Who is the winner, Technosoul ?
Are we talking a healthcare insurance plan and/or coverage or just simply a brand new form of rip off ?
Yet, the major difference between Hillary (Clinton) vs Obama :
- getting rid of lobbyists
That is the major difference.
No the U.S. President has planned and/or considered and/or attempted etc. to get rid of lobbyists, Ever (!) All the politicians talk a lot of many things, and promise a lot of things. Therefore, taking them seriously is a joke. However, Obama is the first presidential candidate who officially presented that concpet, openely. If suuccessful, U.S. has a historic chance to start progressing into the right direction. Hillary (Clinton) does not even consider to go into that direction. Her goal is to Upkeep that status quo, instead (!)
Is my post degrading, really ?
Are we talking about U.S. or private agenda ?
Example (within the Democratic Party field) :
N.Pelosi vs H.Clinton
Hillary (Clinton) is a political imbecile, in comparison to N.Pelosi.
All Hillary (Clinton) wants :
- give me that damn presidential post, People
P.S.
Are you going to split some funds for Hillary's brand new kitchen ? :-))) |