Quote:
Quote by: stevemckay  Gee Jack do you have any credibility? In your “quote” of the article you state:
Yet the actual article you reference states
My, my. How did that little word play happen I wonder? How did “calling for riots” in your quote change to “appear to call for riots” in the article you reference. Looks like a little edit on your part to emphasis your own political agenda perhaps? If you really did that its just further proof to me that the left is more overtly dishonest than the right.
I am not a fan of Rush but I do appreciate his shtick. I heard this broadcast…I also listen to Randy Rhodes when she is not on suspension should you care to know. He was not calling for riots. He was merely stating that A) if the nomination was stolen from Obama than the odds of riots are greater than zero. B) If there were riots than a democrat will most likely not be elected. And C) he would welcome something that ensures a democrat does not get elected.
He emphasized numerous times that he was not endorsing or calling for them but was merely observing (from his right wing view point) the implications if that event were to happen. |
Lol oh please... "Riots would hurt the democrats, but I'm not calling for riots, *wink wink* *nudge nudge*"
give me a break...his implication is clear.