[GHook93]

Quote by: Technosoul That is okay, a liberal judge would be fair but would remain within the limits of the Consitution. So no big deal. A conservative judge would not be as fair because they are not into equal rights but prefer religious domination.

Interpretations of the constitutions. I have read many many opinions and I question many opinions both conservative and liberal. If you think they always get it right how do you account for the ruling that found the separate, but equal doctrine (Plessy v. Ferguson)! Liberal judge sway from the constitution more than the conservative judges do!

The lower courts would no doubt be able to deal with a simple divorse case.

Yes, but this won't be a simple divorce case. This would be an appeal to the supreme court voiding a marriage ab initio.

Spending too much to maintain military control over all the other countries is not viewed by you as socialism none the less it is costing much more then any of the domestic needs in our society.

To answer that question no its not its colonialism. But preemptive war making is historically a Democratic aspect. Spanish American, Korean, Vietnam, Kosovo were all stated by Democrats. The Bush tandem are Republicans that buck the trend. I can't really fault Sr for Desert Storm or Jr for Afghanistan (we were attack by elements of Afghanistan and I firmly support that war).

We live in a dangerous world my friend. The libs can pretend we don't and cry up American Government conspiracies all they want, but the fact remains American needs a strong military.

The Democrats would downsize that expendature, they would make the rich people pay their fair share of taxes (not a raise in taxes but the removal of unjust deductions)

LOLOLOLOL, did you just say fair share of taxes! You have to be joking. Rich people already pay 80% of the taxes. They pay their share.

and they have a solid plan to create many new domestic jobs that will not be outsourced and which are not governmental jobs.

What by raising corporate taxes and regulations? That is a sure fire way to increase the exodus overseas. McCain's plan is to cut taxes and spending and ease regulations and that is how jolt the economy. Both taxes and spending increased under Bush, so Bush's failed policies were right in line with the Democrats.

They will spearhead a program to get the run-away costs of healthcare

How? By socializing healthcare. Be careful what you wish for.

and energy back into balance with the wages of the average and low income citizens.

How by magic or by a strict refusal to drill for domestic sources in AK and the Gulf?

And effect a better way to mangage our current systems of education.

LOL, still not one answer. Only empty promises. The only promise the Democrats will fill is raising taxes and wasteful spending 10 fold.

I agree with your opinon about the Mexican-American vote, but in the Southwestern USA they hold many of the good and average paying jobs and most of our businesses out here are geared to attract that group because they maintain good credit and pay their bills.

Que? You have proof of that, because that goes against everything I saw when I went to school in AZ and every employment statistic printed!

They are the hard working section of our communities and that is why they are advancing

Hardworking no doubt, but they are not advancing up the economic scale like you say. If they did they would be smart and vote Republican.

and why the African Americans resent them which resulted in conflicts between the two races.

Blaming the victims? Blacks are getting ethnically cleansed in LA.

That voting block is hugh. But they are made up of a diversity of opinons and a number of them do favor the Republican objectives, especially because the Pope does not like abortions, which McCain is also outspoken about.

They also like McCain because of McCain/Kennedy! The Latinos will vote for McCain in numbers, I will put money on that.

Some Jewish people are very wealthy and would side with you viewpoints that favor the freedoms that rich people want and which they do not want poor workers to share. Hillary won the Jewish block in Penn according to exit polls and she has a good network within that community already established.

Jewish American is one of the most affluent and wealthiest voting blocks per capitia in America and its been that way for a while. Nevertheless that Jewish vote has overwelmingly voted Democratic throughout the 20th century.

The Democrats were the first party to seclect a Jewish person to be a VP before he double-crossed the party.

Jews won't vote for another Jew or a party just because of this.

Those who favor peace over religion are going to vote Democratic.

See people read way too much into the antisemitic rhetoric. I posted a statistic a while back stating that the Jewish American were over-welming against the war from the being. I don't have time to locate it now.

Obama has too many childhood connections with Islamic teachings to get them excited about his message.

LOL, this is a false conspiracy. I don't think Jews were too afraid of this until Wright controversy broke. But he is not a Muslim and I doubt his time in Indonesia had that much of an effect on him.

He is a tiny bit more liberal then President Bush who is nearly a dictator but he does not even come close to being in the middle.

Bush a dictator? Does the left have no honor? He is a poor President that got us into the biggest military blunder in our history, but he is far from a dictator. And taxes and non-military spending increases are liberal (aka Democrated philosophies), both which took place in great numbers during Bush's Presidency.

So far McCain has dodged every attempt made by her to have a debate, McCain feels only at ease debating Obama but he knows better then to take on Hillary Clinton, as he does not want a knock out in the first round.

Que? He hasn't debated either. Interparty debates happen after the primaries.

He might send in some hatchet men to cut the budgets of many programs that the voters want, such as education and emergency health care, but he still supports massive military expendatures and that is eating away at the flesh and bones of our domestic economy, along with the high costs of medicene and energy, which problem he wants to ignore in favor of the total distruction of Iraq and Iran, and do doubt the West Bank.

Where do you get your information from? This is nonsense. All the left does is cry that the only thing that we spend money on is Iraq. The government wastefully spends on a lot of places, but the left is OK with that. All they will do is raise the red herring of military spending instead. McCain has never approved a wasteful pork barrel project and has done a pretty good job as senator in AZ. On the other hand Clinton pork spending is near the top.