Quote:
| Originally posted by italiangm,+--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (italiangm,)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Compared to heterosexual males, homosexual males exhibit traits that favor nurturing, caretaking, and whole-brain creative thinking minus the tension and miscommunication that often sabotages the opposite sex interaction and bonding process (ie, "Men are from Mars. Women are from Venus.") By definition, these are the positive survival traits that females bring to the table.[/b] |
Well, I suppose I don't know enough homosexual males to make a satisfactory judgement on this. I just remain skeptical, though one gay male I knew did talk about wanting a child often. And since he could not reproduce, all I could see was that him having a child (most likely, or hopefully, adopted and not created through artificial - or real - insemination) would be positive. So many children without homes, and with our overpopulation problem, what's better for those who want children than adoption?
So I really can't argue here :)
<!--QuoteBegin-italiangm, Then, in an act that confirms evolutionary need, these traits continue to be expressed in homosexual males -- a biological entity that, due to its internal hardwired code, does not reproduce. All I'm suggesting is that metrosexuals may be the clumsy prototype for the entity that will replace homosexuals. The fact that they're fumbling dandies at this stage may disappear once they get comfortable in their skin. On the other hand, they might simply represent a fad that will disappear. Only time will tell. :)[/quote]
My argument comes down to this, really: that there are males out there ALREADY that are NOT metrosexuals that are no less "in touch with their feminine side" than metrosexuals (I am actually a feminist myself, something that comes natural to me since I had been raised almost entirely by my older sister and mother and they were my best friends). Metrosexuals, I feel, do no justice for people like us and are still, IMO, abominable (one good example of why would be their exclemation that they are not afraid of being in touch with their feminine side, which is why they aren't opposed to spending a day at the salon - the person that instantly springs to mind is that host of "American Idol". What's so feminine about getting your hair done, a manicure, etc.?)
In any case, time will tell all, I suppose
